was missing, Silvio Berlusconi, in the classroom of Deputies gathered under his command, yesterday, for votargli designed to measure the immunity for himself, allowing him to avoid at the last sentence in the corruption trial in acts current legal proceedings in Milan, where the Knight is accused of having pushed the London lawyer Mills to misrepresent blacks Fininvest funds abroad. I think the political embarrassment, moral and institutional has taken him out of the room where, two months after the birth of his government, abuse of force was yesterday reached its climax, revealing a weakness as a destiny that will weigh on the rest of the legislature. In a country that continues to proclaim the law equal for all, after yesterday's vote, and pending urgent than the Knight of the Senate is poised to strengthen its position as "more equal" of his fellow citizens, depriving the accused Berlusconi to his legitimate judge who is on trial for common crimes, not at all related to political activity. To do this, the accused Berlusconi had to ask for help to Prime Minister Berlusconi, who has not hesitated to use to the full executive power to force the legislation a provision that will prevent the judiciary. Indeed, more. Until he was sure the approval of the "award" prepared by the ad-hoc Attorney Alfano, in collaboration with the team of lawyers personal-president accused the prime minister has sent out emergency rule as an amendment that stopped 100 000 prosecutions just to stop her. Yesterday, security had become now that the immunity law, Berlusconi has agreed to undo the rule-block processes, thus demonstrating blatantly (although it would not be served to understand the proof) that the rule had no real urgency, but it was just instrumental in its defense.
Here is the embarrassment of Italian democracy, in this ongoing contamination of private and public law, which form what is called abuse of office (More punishable offense), deforms the impartiality of the court, makes the separation of powers. The three functions in the modern state are handled by separate bodies in a position of mutual independence and autonomy in order to guarantee that the pursuit of sovereign is subject to the right. It 'been repeatedly seen what happens if the same man makes the laws, executes commands, and considers the infringements. But what happens when the same man makes the laws, executes commands and makes sure that no one can judge his offenses? This indeed is the case in which security becomes a privilege, and immunity studied by the Constitution in view of the Civil Service and its protection - Not in the interest of the individual but the community - is reduced to impunity built in the exclusive interest of one charge but not a person with an improper advantage that is free from burdens and responsibilities that apply to all other citizens. It is not just a classroom that is becoming the defense team of the premier, who uses his will to all sorts of distorting the work schedule.
In fact, on a cultural level, there is something more. A stretch in the material constitution of the country, the political structure of the system, so that this excess of authority will emerge a new understanding of the state, the supremacy of the leader who won the elections and this is untouchable because it is one with the will of the people in sacred union to the point that no law, no right, no power can take action to review. Through this view, the legitimate leader of the country became sovereign in fact, it takes possession of a Constitution that sovereignty belongs to the people, not "emanate" from the people to some power as today you want to believe and how to claim the theory of modern populism but resides in the people because the people who practice it, "as the indispensable mark - you said in the debate in the Constituent Assembly - the democratic regime."
Tuesday took to the streets thousands of citizens who thought they were protesting against the Berlusconi government and legality, as it would have been appropriate at an event organized by the opposition. That square, made of unknown people who wanted to reconnect to the public discourse at a delicate moment is just a reaction to the principle of caiman. But the question the whole policy was in place by the citizens (and many others who did not attend for many reasons, but also because it did not recognize themselves in form, manner and organization in the program) has been served a response of opposite sign , all anti-political. With a crescendo of "Corrida" that mixed planetary complaints and jokes on the Knight, accusations Napolitano (as if the guarantee institutions, the real problem in the country), and Pd as the primary enemy, according to the established tradition of the worst left, so the real enemy is your friend. Through this mechanism, which replaced the "idols" of the show to the leaders by transforming their language in political discourse and reducing citizens to spectators applauding, broke the institutional framework in which the drama is making the showdown Berlusconi. You may recall the reasons that led these people to the streets, trying to give them political direction, a democratic path, a possible outlet? Many
"Girotondo" have understood the limits of anti-, which probably has consumed his season here. The PD should have included that the policy vacuum creates monsters like Grillo, and we must build a reformist horizon who can mobilize and respond, giving radical values \u200b\u200band rights, especially when they are under attack. The next spread, the Catholic center, the moderates who do not accept the handover of sovereignty have available a simple and necessary: \u200b\u200bdemocracy as a common idea, in Italy's ill-fated 2008.
0 comments:
Post a Comment